Dorman v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that “a principal is affected with . . . knowledge of all [information] of which his agent receives notice while acting within the scope of his authority”
• stating the knowledge possessed by one’s attorney is imputed to that person
• providing the injured party does not have to obtain \actual knowledge of either the potential claim or of the facts giving rise thereto\ and it is irrelevant whether he fully comprehends the extent of the damage
• stating the statute of limitations begins to run when an injured party is presented with facts that \would put a person of common knowledge and experience on notice that some right of his has been invaded or that some claim against another party might exist\
• \[T]he fact that the injured party may not comprehend the full extent of the damage is immaterial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).