· 8/8/2001
Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., LC
Citations
- 61 S.W.3d 555
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 5317
- 2001 WL 884144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that forcible-detainer actions in justice court may be prosecuted concurrently with title disputes in district court
- noting justice courts are without jurisdiction to adjudicate title to land
- “[I]f the question of title is so intertwined with the issue of possession, then possession may not be adjudicated without first determining title.”
- alleged lack of foreclosure notice and opportunity to cure did not defeat jurisdiction of county court to determine immediate possession
- whether trustee complied with deed of trust is ―of no 7 consequence‖ to the county court’s jurisdiction
- A [I]f the question of title is so intertwined with the issue of possession, then possession may not be adjudicated without first determining title. @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardberger, Rickhoff, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.