Skip to main content
· 8/8/2001

Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., LC

Citations

  • 61 S.W.3d 555
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 5317
  • 2001 WL 884144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that forcible-detainer actions in justice court may be prosecuted concurrently with title disputes in district court
  • noting justice courts are without jurisdiction to adjudicate title to land
  • “[I]f the question of title is so intertwined with the issue of possession, then possession may not be adjudicated without first determining title.”
  • alleged lack of foreclosure notice and opportunity to cure did not defeat jurisdiction of county court to determine immediate possession
  • whether trustee complied with deed of trust is ―of no 7 consequence‖ to the county court’s jurisdiction
  • A [I]f the question of title is so intertwined with the issue of possession, then possession may not be adjudicated without first determining title. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardberger, Rickhoff, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.