· 4/14/2006
Doris N. Passehl Estate, David Passehl And Karen Zander, Co-executors Vs. Jerry W. Passehl And Volnetta Passehl
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting section 41(d)(1)(A) as requiring “the taxpayer to satisfy all the elements for a deduction under section 174”
- “[I]t is evident that Congress intended only that the taxpayer’s activities provide some level of functional improvement, at a minimum.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.