Skip to main content

Doris Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trier of fact is required.to consider the fault of all parties who contributed to the alleged injury, including plaintiffs and non-parties when only a single defendant is sued
  • “apportioning fault, not damages, [was] the issue” in that interlocutory appeal
  • trial court was required to allow * apportionment of fault in an action asserting legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty that caused financial losses
  • trial court was required to allow apportionment of fault in an action asserting legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty that caused financial losses
  • the trial court erred in striking Alston & Bird’s notice of nonparty fault
  • applying OCGA § 51-12-33 in a business-related tort action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.