Dorich v. DiBacco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Finding plaintiffs claim to be \economically unable to obtain\ expert witnesses to not be a compelling reason for docket inactivity.
• defendant’s act of responding to plaintiffs discovery request, as he was required to do under Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, was not inconsistent with his request for a non pros
• plaintiff had duty to move case forward despite lack of financial resources sufficient to retain expert witness necessary to establish liability and damages in a medical malpractice case
• plaintiff had the duty to move case forward despite lack of financial resources sufficient to retain expert witness necessary to establish liability and damages in a medical malpractice case
• economic inability to secure expert witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).