Skip to main content
· 12/23/1975

Doremus v. Farrell

Citations

  • 407 F. Supp. 509
  • 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a jury trial is not constitutionally required to afford due process in a state civil commitment proceeding
  • declaring predecessor to current Commitment Act violated due process rights, in part because it did not have recent overt act requirement
  • striking down statute which authorized detention of individual who is “mentally ill” and “a fit subject for custody and treatment in a hospital”
  • \poses a serious threat of substantial harm to himself or to others\
  • probable cause hearing within five days; full hearing within fourteen days
  • probable cause hearing within five days; full hearing within fourteen days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Schatz, Denney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.