Doree Stein v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General, and Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that impairment limited plaintiff’s major life activities because plaintiff failed to support claim with medical evidence
• applying Toyota analysis to the court’s consideration of whether plaintiffs impairment substantially limited major life activities of “loss of sleep, impaired sexual relations, inability to participate in sports, inability to cut her food and inability to brush her hair.”
• “Bald and self-serving assertions ... unsubstantiated by any documentation or other testimony, are not sufficient to create a material issue of fact....”
• “Bald and self-serving assertions . . . unsubstantiated by any documentation or other testimony, are not sufficient to create a material issue of fact . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).