District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/7/1975
Dorati v. Dorati
Citations
- 342 A.2d 18
- 1975 D.C. App. LEXIS 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An essential premise of any application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens is the availability of an alternative forum”
- “An essential premise of any application of the doctrine of forum non conveniens is the availability of an alternative forum”
- defendant, a resident of Switzerland with substantial contacts in D.C., not entitled to dismissal for forum non conveniens of suit by nonresident to enforce support agreement executed in California
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reilly, Kern, Yeagley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- The Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C. v. Heinrich Bauer VerlagD.C. Circuit· 1976-06-01· cited 73×
- Carr v. Bio-Medical Applications of Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-12-01· cited 51×
- Crown Oil & Wax Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-04-21· cited 30×
- MacLeod v. MacLeodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-03-10· cited 28×
- Horlander v. HorlanderIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 27×
- Washington v. May Department StoresDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-23· cited 21×
- Consumer Federation of America v. Upjohn CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-10-07· cited 20×
- Creamer v. CreamerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-09-19· cited 19×
- Smith v. Alder Branch Realty Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-11-21· cited 18×
- Mobley v. Southern Railway Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-08-08· cited 17×
- Haynes v. CarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-11-23· cited 15×
- Asch v. TaveresDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-10-17· cited 14×
- Deupree v. LeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-25· cited 12×
- Avila v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-13· cited 10×
- Barclays Bank, S.A. v. TsakosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-06-03· cited 10×
- Florida Education Assoc., Inc. v. National Education Assoc. of the United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-26· cited 4×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 1×
- Chang v. Yea Tung HungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-04
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonSecond Circuit· 1956-06-01· cited 343×
- Holophane Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-11-13· cited 173×
- All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliThird Circuit· 1952-05-08· cited 143×
- Edward R. Burt v. Isthmus Development CompanyFifth Circuit· 1955-02-03· cited 80×
- Louis Hoffman v. Allan N. GobermanThird Circuit· 1970-01-06· cited 69×
- Frost v. PEOPLES DRUG STORE, INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-10-31· cited 54×
- North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, of Millington, Michigan v. W. Reuen Fisher, Village of Entrance, Alberta, CanadaD.C. Circuit· 1960-12-07· cited 51×
- Wilburn v. WilburnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-07-22· cited 42×
- Melvin v. MelvinD.C. Circuit· 1942-06-08· cited 39×
- Tasanilla Hopson v. Delores Palmer HopsonD.C. Circuit· 1955-01-20· cited 36×
- J. F. Pritchard and Company v. Dow Chemical of Canada, LimitedEighth Circuit· 1972-06-29· cited 30×
- Curley v. CurleyD.C. Circuit· 1941-06-02· cited 24×
- Domingo v. States Marine LinesS.D. New York· 1972-04-13· cited 21×
- Dermot A. Nee and Antoinette K. Nee v. Joseph v. Dillon and Lois B. DillonD.C. Circuit· 1956-12-13· cited 19×
- Walsh v. Crescent Hill Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1957-09-16· cited 18×
- Gray v. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp.Supreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 18×
- District-Realty Title Insurance Corp. v. GoodrichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-11-20· cited 15×
- Pitts v. Woodward and LothropDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-10-31· cited 10×
- Clark v. ClarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1958-10-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.