Skip to main content
· 3/17/2009

Doran v. Chand

Citations

  • 284 S.W.3d 659
  • 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 329
  • 2009 WL 667476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding employer’s promise not to discriminate against employees on the basis of race does not constitute consideration because the law obligates employer not to discriminate
  • the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to amend where the plaintiffs did not describe to the trial court—or this Court on appeal—what new allegations they wished to present to cure the inadequacy of their original petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Ellis, Ahuja

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.