Skip to main content
· 10/15/2003

Doral Produce Corp., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Paul Steinberg Assoc., Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Mark C.H. Mandell

Citations

  • 347 F.3d 36
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20948
  • 2003 WL 22346383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing factors that obviate need to afford alleged contemnor right to defend himself
  • recognizing factors that obviate need to afford alleged contemnor right to defend himself
  • collecting Second Circuit cases holding that, prior to the “imposition of monetary sanctions,” a district court “is ordinarily obligated to give the person being sanctioned an opportunity to be heard in defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Leval, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.