Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1794(d) is “reasonably compatible with a lodestar adjustment method of calculating attorney 25 fees because the lodestar adjustment method is based on actual, reasonable attorney time expended as the objective starting point of the analysis.”
• “The trial court cannot impose sanctions for misuse of the discovery process as a punishment.”
• “[T]here is no rule prohibiting a party from bringing 12 ||}a second motion to recover attorney fees incurred since an initial motion was filed.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).