Skip to main content
· 7/1/1855

Dopman v. Hoberlin

Citations

  • 5 Cal. 413

Syllabus

<p>The plaintiff introduced two witnesses, to prove the value of his services in going twice to Europe to negotiate the purchase of an estate, etc.; hut it was not shown that he undertook these voyages at the request of the defendant, or in what capacity he went. Held, that the Court erred in admitting the testimony, as the question was hypothetical, and assumed a state of facts not in proof.</p>

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.