Doolin v. Environmental Power Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because alleged fraud related only to the legal interpretation of terms of a document conveying interest in land, the “alleged misrepresentation, in the exercise of due diligence, should have been ascertained at th[e] time” of the alleged fraud
• adopting the rule in Carter v. Stanton, 405 U.S. 669, 671, 92 S.Ct. 1232, 1234, 31 L.Ed.2d 569 (1972)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).