Skip to main content
· 10/22/1982

Dooley v. James A. Dooley Associates Employees Retirement Plan

Citations

  • 442 N.E.2d 222
  • 92 Ill. 2d 476
  • 65 Ill. Dec. 911
  • 1982 Ill. LEXIS 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • For an insured to effect a beneficiary change, “[t]here must be a combination of intent to make the change and positive action towards effecting that end.”
  • handwritten changes and decedent’s communication with attorney insufficient to show substantial compliance when, having complied with policy terms in the past, testator knew that signed, typewritten changes were required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Underwood, Ward, Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.