· 10/22/1982
Dooley v. James A. Dooley Associates Employees Retirement Plan
Citations
- 442 N.E.2d 222
- 92 Ill. 2d 476
- 65 Ill. Dec. 911
- 1982 Ill. LEXIS 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- For an insured to effect a beneficiary change, “[t]here must be a combination of intent to make the change and positive action towards effecting that end.”
- handwritten changes and decedent’s communication with attorney insufficient to show substantial compliance when, having complied with policy terms in the past, testator knew that signed, typewritten changes were required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Underwood, Ward, Moran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.