Dooley v. Chappell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Serbian Restitution Agency an adequate alternative forum for property disputes despite being a \nonjudicial mode[] of dispute resolution\
• rejecting Plaintiffs’ argument that the “SRA’s remedies are so meager as to amount to ‘no remedy at all’”
• describing Plaintiffs’ dispute as “more appropriately addressed by the [SRA] than by the federal district court in Chicago”
• “[N]o reason has been given to us to doubt the adequacy of the SRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).