Dookeran v. Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment in favor of defendants on the section 3730(h)(1) retaliation claim because there was not a distinct possibility that a viable FCA action could be filed since no “claim” had been made on the government within the meaning of section 3729
• “If there is no way that [Plaintiff’s] conduct of informing [Defendant’s] administrators about the allegedly fraudulent application could reasonably lead to a viable FCA action, then the whistleblower provision provides him no protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).