DOODY, KATHLEEN v. GOTTSHALL, KENNETH L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the hospital opened the door to previously excluded evidence by introducing exhibits discussing a medical condition in cross-examination, which then allowed the appellant to ask about the same medical condition during redirect cross-examination
• explaining that even though lay witnesses may not testify to medical causation, they can testify to witnessing a deterioration in symptoms
• noting that decision to grant or deny motion for mistrial is discretionary
• noting rule permits expert to rely on records and consultation with others who reviewed records
• discussing the foundational requirements of Idaho Rule of Evidence 703

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).