Skip to main content
· 1/29/2002

Donyel v. Brown v. Ernie Roe, Warden

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 742
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1073
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 802
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1192
  • 2002 WL 109288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the Fourth Circuit’s requirement that a district court must consider new arguments raised in objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation
  • applying the same 16 rule to a habeas claim raised for the first time in objections to an R&R
  • rejecting the Fourth Circuit’s requirement that a district court must consider new arguments raised in objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation
  • district court has discretion to consider arguments or evidence 17 presented for the first time in a party’s objections
  • the court has discretion but is not required to consider evidence or 12 arguments presented for the first time in a party’s objection to a magistrate judge’s 13 recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Fletcher, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.