Skip to main content
· 7/28/2009

Donscheski v. DONSCHESKI

Citations

  • 771 N.W.2d 213
  • 17 Neb. Ct. App. 807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a journal entry in a child custody dispute was not final because it did not dispose of all issues, the issues of parenting time and child support were taken under advisement
  • finding that child who was 12 years old, going into seventh grade, who received mostly A’s and B’s in school was of sufficient age and intelligence for his preference and reasoning on custody matters to be heard and considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inbody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.