Donovan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the claimant’s testimony of being 29 injured by improperly disposed hypodermic needles did not require corroboration because the claimant was describing actual events
• stating that the claimant must “show that a physical stimulus resulted in a mental disability”
• claimant required blood work and booster shots after being pricked by hypodermic needles
• “[A] reviewing court may not consider issues not raised before the governmental unit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).