Skip to main content
· 10/24/1995

Donovan v. Ritchie

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 14
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30145
  • 1995 WL 613515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that inclusion of a ban on athletic and extracurricular activities along with a brief suspension did not “trigger a requirement for a more formal set of procedures”
  • concluding that inclusion of a ban on athletic and extracurricular activities along with a brief suspension did not \trigger a requirement for a more formal set of procedures\
  • finding adequate notice where the principal sent a letter to the student elaborating on and specifying the bases for suspension and referring to the relevant school policy
  • “[T]he mere fact a prosecution was unsuccessful does not mean 17 it was not supported by probable cause.”
  • “A motion to dismiss based on the running of the statute of 17 limitations period may be granted only if the assertions of the complaint, read with the required 18 liberality, would not permit the plaintiff to prove that the statute was tolled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Aldrich, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.