Donovan v. INCORPORATION VILLAGE OF MALVERNE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant can defeat a First Amendment retaliation claim if \the defendant can show that the employee's speech was likely to sufficiently disrupt government activities so as to outweigh the First Amendment value of the plaintiff's speech\
• finding in a case arising from the very same facts that there was sufficient evidence to infer a causal connection where Málveme officials suggested that candidates must quit union positions to be promoted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).