Donovan v. Commercial Sewing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the OSHA complaint was the but-for cause of the plaintiff's termination, given the temporal connection between that complaint and the subsequent termination
• observing that “OSHA does not incorporate a statutory duty to mitigate damages as does Title VII”
• after 5 “The Court’s decision to grant Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment renders Defendants’ motion for summary judgment moot.” Champagne Demolition, 2016 WL 3629095, at . finding “that the defendant did violate [Section 11(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).