Donovan v. Bel-Loc Diner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requirement that testimony establishing a pattern or practice must refer to all nontestifying employees “would thwart the purposes of the sort of representational testimony clearly contemplated by Mt. Clemens”
• testimony of 22 employees for DoL supporting award of backpay to group of 98 employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).