Donovan Construction, Inc. v. Vacker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that parol evidence is admissible for the purpose of explaining an ambiguity in a written instrument
• explaining that, although use of parol evidence is disallowed if offered solely to vary or contradict written terms of integrated contract, parol evidence is permitted ‘‘(1) to explain an ambiguity appearing in the instrument; (2
• “The parol evidence rule pertains to contract terms, not assertions of fact.”
• discussion of exceptions to parole evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).