Skip to main content
· 6/10/1988

Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon Associates

Citations

  • 369 S.E.2d 857
  • 235 Va. 531
  • 4 Va. Law Rep. 3040
  • 1988 Va. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that absolute privilege protected filing of mechanic’s lien because “it is a prerequisite to a suit to enforce”
  • recognizing that “a cause of action for malicious prosecution will lie for the malicious institution of a groundless civil proceeding”
  • finding that the filing of a memorandum of mechanic’s lien, which is a prerequisite to filing a lawsuit to enforce the lien, was a judicial proceeding entitled to absolute privilege
  • “Public policy demands that within all reasonable limits a litigant should have the right to state his case as he sees fit.”
  • “[T]he General Assembly enunciated a policy consideration that those furnishing labor and materials in construction should be paid or have recourse by lodging a lien against the property benefitted by their labor or material.”
  • “[T]he General Assembly enunciated a policy consideration that those furnishing labor and materials in construction should be paid or have recourse by lodging a lien against the property benefitted by their labor or material.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Poff, Compton, Stephenson, Thomas, Whiting, Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.