· 3/8/2001
Donoho v. State
Citations
- 39 S.W.3d 324
- 2001 WL 83396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrant-less arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in “violation of the law”
- holding that because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrantless arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in \violation of the law\
- holding that because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrantless arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in “violation of the law”
- holding that because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrantless arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in “violation of the law”
- holding that, because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrantless arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in \violation of the law\
- holding that, because appellant committed the aggravated assault after his warrantless arrest, evidence of the assault was not obtained in \violation of the law\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Gardner, Farris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.