Donoghue v. Casual Male Retail Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here was a sufficient ‘span of time between the purchase[s] and sale in which the market could fluctuate’ to give rise to the ‘possibility for insider speculative abuse.’” (second alteration in Casual Male Retail Group

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).