Skip to main content
· 6/14/2002

Donoghue v. American Nat. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 838 So. 2d 1032
  • 2002 WL 1302538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, if an exhibit is central to and referred to in the complaint, its consideration does not convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for a summary judgment
  • noting that, if an exhibit is central to and referred to in the complaint, its consideration does not convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for a summary judgment
  • adopting the rule “precluding conversion when the exhibits in question are referred to in, and are central to, the plaintiffs complaint”
  • insurance contract attached to a motion to dismiss did not convert that motion into a sumary-judgment motion because the complaint specifically referenced the policy, which was the foundation for the underlying claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.