Donofrio Ex Rel. Donofrio v. Rockville Centre Union Free School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disagreement with treatment does not constitute deliberate indifference
• explaining that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
• explaining that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
• noting that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
• rejecting a claim of deliberate indifference where the inmate could not show a “consensus in the medical community” about a particular course of treatment
• “[T]he WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate over [GCS].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).