Skip to main content
· 4/24/2014

Donnetta Newell v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 7 N.E.3d 367
  • 2014 WL 1632232
  • 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was for the fact-finder to determine whether the defendant'-was venting to a friend, or whether the defendant made a true threat
  • there was sufficient evidence defendant intended to communicate a threat to the victim, the manager of an apartment complex, because defendant made the threat in the presence of a security guard that the defendant knew would report the threat to the manager
  • finding sufficient evidence that the defendant intended to communicate a threat to the victim, the manager of an apartment complex, because defendant made the threat in the presence of a security guard who the defendant knew would report the threat to the manager

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Vaidik, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.