Donnelly v. Donatelli & Klein, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the interpretive tool did not apply when the contract was not ambiguous
• “[W]hile labels may be helpful in determining contractual intent, they are not controlling.”
• Virginia partnership agreements are interpreted as contracts between the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).