Donnell Mitchell v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Appeals Council is not required to discuss new evidence when denying review
• holding that there is no requirement that “the Appeals Council … provide a detailed discussion of a claimant’s evidence when denying a request for review”
• holding that there is no requirement that “the Appeals Council . . . provide a detailed discussion of a claimant’s new evidence when denying a request for review”
• concluding that the Appeals Council adequately evaluated new evidence submitted where it accepted the evidence but denied review because the additional evidence failed to establish error in the ALJ’s decision
• providing that if the Appeals Council considers new evidence but denies review, the Appeals Council is not required to articulate its reasons for denying review
• explaining that an ALJ’s decision need only be explicit enough to enable a reviewing court to determine the reasoning behind findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).