Donna Briggs v. John J. Callahan, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the denial of benefits was supported by substantial evidence because the child’s hyperactivity was not a significant limitation where it improved with medication
• stating that “although the ALJ did not specifically discuss [the] condition in the context of listing 112.05(D),” the record supported the conclusion
• stating that “[a]lthough the ALJ did not specifically discuss [the] condition in the context of listing 112.05(D),” the record supported the conclusion
• stating that “although the ALJ did not specifically discuss [the] condition in the context of listing 112.05(D),” the record supported the conclusion
• holding the denial of benefits was supported by substantial evidence because the child’s hyperactivity was not a significant limitation where it improved with medication
• “although [plaintiff] undoubtedly has additional impairments, there has been no showing that the impairments impose a significant limitation on [plaintiff’s] activities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).