Skip to main content
· 9/13/1995

Donmar Enterprises, Incorporated v. Southern National Bank of North Carolina, and Southern International Corporation

Citations

  • 64 F.3d 944
  • 27 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 941
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25898
  • 1995 WL 541464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “any liability founded on state law of negligence or wrongful payment would necessarily be in conflict with the federal regulations and is pre-empted”
  • affirming that conclusion without analysis
  • “[A]ny state causes of action based on negligence or unlawful payment on the facts of this case are pre-empted by Regulation J.”
  • \[A]ny state causes of action based on negligence or unlawful payment [with respect to wire transfers governed by Subpart B] are pre-empted by Regulation J\
  • “Plaintiff's suit seeks recovery of at least $187,276.71 under three legal theories; 12 C.F.R. 210 et seq (Federal Reserve Board Regulation J), common law negligence, and wrongful payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Widener, Brinkema, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.