Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Commerce “reasonably exercised its dis- cretion in rejecting the requests and in enforcing the appli- cable deadline”
• acknowledging Commerce's discretion regarding the ability to set and enforce its deadlines
• “It is not for [respondent] to establish Commerce’s deadlines or to dic- tate to Commerce whether and when Commerce actually needs the requested information.” (cleaned up)
• further explaining that “it is not for [respondent] to establish Commerce’s deadlines or to dictate to Commerce whether and when Commerce actually needs the requested information” (cleaned up)
• “Com- merce is continuing to base its determination to reject [Tau-Ken’s] . . . questionnaire response as untimely based on the lateness of the submission, rather than the content of the BPI version of the response.” (emphasis added)
• discussing the Supplemental Question- naire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).