Dongbu Tour & Travel, Inc. v. Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a policy’s definition of “advertising” does not encompass “the sale (without more
• holding that the “parties could not have reasonably expected that the advertising injury coverage of the Policies would extend to the insured’s sale of infringing goods” or that “ ‘advertising’ would include the sale (without more)‘of counterfeit products”
• “As a matter of common sense, there is a difference between the placement of a counterfeit brand label on a handbag and the act of soliciting customers through printed advertisements or other media.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).