· 8/7/1996
Doney v. Clatsop County
Citations
- 921 P.2d 1346
- 142 Or. App. 497
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a party who had the opportunity to participate in a land use decision may not collaterally attack that final decision in a later proceeding
- LUBA’s jurisdiction is exclusive where a land use decisional process was available, even if not pursued.
- recogniz- ing that it was “clear” from existing waiver case law “that the county may not have a second bite at the apple”
- recogniz- ing that it was “clear” from existing waiver case law “that the county may not have a second bite at the apple”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.