Skip to main content
· 8/7/1996

Doney v. Clatsop County

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 1346
  • 142 Or. App. 497
  • 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a party who had the opportunity to participate in a land use decision may not collaterally attack that final decision in a later proceeding
  • LUBA’s jurisdiction is exclusive where a land use decisional process was available, even if not pursued.
  • recogniz- ing that it was “clear” from existing waiver case law “that the county may not have a second bite at the apple”
  • recogniz- ing that it was “clear” from existing waiver case law “that the county may not have a second bite at the apple”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.