U.S. Tax Court· 8/11/1981
Doncaster v. Commissioner
Citations
- 77 T.C. 334
- 1981 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that deemed admissions under Rule 37(c) are sufficient to satisfy the government's burden of proof with respect to the issue of fraud
- holding that deemed admissions under Rule 37(c) are sufficient to satisfy the Government's burden of proof with respect to the issue of fraud
- fraud allegations deemed admitted under Rule 37(c); Mann v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-662 (fraud established through compelled stipulations of fact under Rule 91(f); Pimbley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-103 (fraud established through deemed admissions under Rule 90
- fraud allegations deemed admitted under Rule 37(c); Mann v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1982-662 (fraud established through compelled stipulations of fact under Rule 91(f); Pimbley v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1982-103 (fraud established through deemed admissions under Rule 90
- a Court-reviewed opinion relating to facts deemed admitted under Rule 37(c)
- deemed admissions under Rule 37(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tannenwald,Dawson,Fay,Simpson,Hall,Wiles,Wilbur,Irwin,Sterrett,Wilbur,Fay,Featherston,Wiles,Goffe,Chabot,Ekman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dahlstrom v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1985-11-19· cited 481×
- Marshall v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1985-08-13· cited 168×
- Kotmair v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1986-06-19· cited 144×
- Rechtzigel v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1982-07-26· cited 133×
- Donald G. Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSixth Circuit· 1991-04-22· cited 126×
- Brooks v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1984-03-08· cited 125×
- Smith v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1988-12-12· cited 102×
- Claude Douge and Jacqueline Douge v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1990-03-26· cited 71×
- Richard M. Baptiste, Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueEleventh Circuit· 1994-08-29· cited 57×
- Wedvik v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1986-12-30· cited 40×
- Bosurgi v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1986-12-23· cited 34×
- Brock v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1989-05-23· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ralph Freedson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1978-01-10· cited 170×
- Freedson v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1975-11-12· cited 147×
- Marcus v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1978-07-31· cited 139×
- Gilday v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1974-05-29· cited 118×
- Gordon v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1980-01-30· cited 110×
- United States of America and Anthony Carsanaro, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. The Freedom Church and Reverend Richard M. DoncasterFirst Circuit· 1979-12-28· cited 62×
- Teresa Baez, Individually and as Next Friend of Francisco Baez, Jr . v. S. S. Kresge CompanyFifth Circuit· 1975-09-02· cited 56×
- Miller-Pocahontas Coal Co. v. CommissionerBoard of Tax Appeals· 1931-01-26· cited 42×
- Ritchie v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1979-04-12· cited 39×
- Stanley v. Continental Oil Co.Tenth Circuit· 1976-06-23· cited 24×
- American Auto Insurance Co. v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Alvah C. Luce, D/B/A Northern Electric Service & Supply Co.First Circuit· 1959-07-24· cited 20×
- R. M. Edwards and Dorothy Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Loyd W. Disler and Joy Disler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueTenth Circuit· 1969-10-20· cited 20×
- Edwards v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1968-05-02· cited 12×
- United States v. Edgewater Dyeing & Finishing Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1957-11-13· cited 8×
- United States v. Roslyn Construction Co.D. Maine· 1958-09-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.