Skip to main content
· 2/18/1992

Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp. v. Star Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 180 A.D.2d 495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing NIED claim as duplicative of defamation claim and noting plaintiff “may properly recover for the alleged emotional distress caused by the defamatory statements under the cause of action for defamation”
  • “The plaintiff may properly recover for the alleged emotional distress caused by the defamatory statements under the cause of action for defamation.” (citation omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.