Donald Welch v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing a public reprimand on respondent with no prior disciplinary record when prohibited communication resulted in substantial harm; rejecting request to privately admonish respondent
• imposing public reprimand on attorney without prior disciplinary history because prohibited communication resulted in substantial harm and rejecting request to privately admonish respondent
• imposing a public reprimand on respondent with no prior disciplinary record for communicating with a represented party without opposing counsel’s consent
• “We have consistently held that harm to a client or third party is an aggravating factor with regard to disciplinary violations.”
• stating the attorney had a reputation as a competent attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).