Skip to main content
· 7/19/1994

Donald W. Geib, D/B/A Rochester Colonial Amoco v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 1050
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17485
  • 1994 WL 371515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that certification is appropriate “where an important question of state law has arisen solely in federal court”
  • Michigan Supreme Court should have the opportunity to address the construction of a provision under the Michigan Franchise Investment Law, and there was no reasonably clear result when federal court decisions directly conflicted in their interpretation of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Boggs, Engel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.