Donald v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• at sentencing, evidence generally admissible under the Rules of Evidence concerning alleged prior drug-related activity by the appellant would be relevant as providing proof of the appellant’s character, and as an aggravating circumstance under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-97-103(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marshall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-09-28· cited 20×
• Ross v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-09-06· cited 1×
• Ervin v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-04-10· cited 1×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harkness v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-11-13· cited 52×
• Brewer v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-09-10· cited 2×
• Pack v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-01-28· cited 2×