Skip to main content

Donald v. State

Citations

  • 562 So. 2d 792
  • 1990 WL 70404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opposite result as to § 775.084(4)(b); State v. Brown, 530 So.2d 51, not cited
  • “court has the option, under section 775.084(4)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), of deciding that sentencing under the statute is not necessary for the protection of the public”
  • sentence imposed upon resentencing to correct illegal habitual offender sentence reversed where the second sentence was not in conformity with term required by habitual felony offender statute
  • if illegal sentence has been imposed, there is no constitutional impediment to sentencing defendant to greater sentence upon resentencing, as long as judicial vindictiveness plays no part in resentencing
  • under section 775.084, as amended in 1988, once the court determines that a defendant has met the criteria as set forth in section 775.084 and is habitualized, it must sentence the defendant to a sentence pursuant to section 775.084

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.