Donald v. Cafe Royale, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Viewing the statute reasonably and in a common sense fashion compels the conclusion that no intent element is set forth.”
• “[T]he [California] Legislature’s purpose in imposing increased penalties and additional enforcement methods is to guarantee compliance with equal access requirements.”
• “Government Code section 4450 et seq. requires that facilities conform to building 17 standards published in the State Building Standards Code relating to access for the physically 18 handicapped.”
• extensively reviewing the repeated expansion of the CDPA’s enforcement mechanisms and concluding that it “is plain [that] the Legislature’s purpose in imposing increased penalties and additional enforcement methods is to guarantee compliance with equal access requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).