Donald S. Aiello v. Detroit Free Press, Inc., Carl L. Briscoe v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a veteran returning from military absence “is not 2 entitled to benefits which require more than continued status, such as a work requirement 3 demanding actual performance on the job”
• stating that a “work requirement demanded actual performance on the job”
• addressing a related predecessor statute and explaining that the veteran returning from military absence “is not entitled to benefits which require more than continued status, such as a work requirement demanding actual performance on the job”
• a section 9-vacation pay case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).