Skip to main content
· 11/4/1997

Donald Ray Harpster v. State of Ohio

Citations

  • 128 F.3d 322
  • 1997 WL 574899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The manifest necessity doctrine does not require us to find that the trial court had no alternative but to declare a mistrial.”
  • amount of prejudice that could have resulted was miniscule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lively, Kennedy, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.