· 3/15/1995
Donald R. Hagan v. Paul D. Caspari, Donald R. Hagan v. Paul D. Caspari
Citations
- 50 F.3d 542
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4929
- 1995 WL 107500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree . . . that until the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”
- “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree ... that until, the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”
- “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree . . . that until the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Wollman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.