Skip to main content
· 3/15/1995

Donald R. Hagan v. Paul D. Caspari, Donald R. Hagan v. Paul D. Caspari

Citations

  • 50 F.3d 542
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4929
  • 1995 WL 107500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree . . . that until the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”
  • “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree ... that until, the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”
  • “[W]e are strongly inclined to agree . . . that until the state’s highest court has spoken on a particular point of state law, the law of the state necessarily must be regarded as unsettled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Wollman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.