Donald Plummer v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[r]econsideration is appropriate” if “the 5 district court committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust”
• agreeing that juror testimony regarding an alleged clerical error such as announcing a verdict different than that agreed upon, does not challenge the validity of the verdict or the deliberation or mental processes, and therefore is not subject to Rule 606(b)
• holding “that juror testimony regarding an al- leged clerical error, such as announcing a verdict different than that agreed upon, does not challenge the validity of the verdict or deliberation of mental processes, and there- fore is not subject to Rule 606(b)”
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 5 the discovery was necessary to decide the dispositive motion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 17 the discovery was necessary to decide the dispositive motion
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if 5 the discovery was necessary to decide the dispositive motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).