· 7/28/2000
Federal Case
Citations
- 222 F.3d 123
- 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1320
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the district court erred by granting summary 13 Although Plaintiff argues that the REA failed to consider Dr. Hertza’s functional limitations (Pl. Mov. Br. at 14 & 23 n.6
- standard of review depends on discretion afforded plan administrator
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.