Skip to main content
· 7/28/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 222 F.3d 123
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1320
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court erred by granting summary 13 Although Plaintiff argues that the REA failed to consider Dr. Hertza’s functional limitations (Pl. Mov. Br. at 14 & 23 n.6
  • standard of review depends on discretion afforded plan administrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.